Today 4137

Yesterday 11622

All 53860941

Friday, 2.01.2026
Transforming Government since 2001
Private and voluntary organisations will need payment if they are to act as e-government 'intermediaries', says a new report

The UK Government should pay private and voluntary sectors to deliver public e-services, according to an influential report published on 24 November 2003.

Read more: UK: Intermediaries will cost

A leading think tank has called on ministers to pay the private sector to deliver e-government services.

In a report published on Monday, the Institute for Public Policy Research said that companies and voluntary sector organisations could provide electronic public services alongside their usual services.

Read more: UK: Think tank seeks e-government 'revoluton'

Surrey County Council is almost two years ahead of schedule in meeting targets for electronic service delivery.

In 2001 central government asked all local authorities to make as many services as possible available to the public through the internet and telephone. Surrey County Council responded by making its services available ahead of schedule. Currently, 83 per cent of its services are obtainable in these formats, and 100 per cent will be accessible by 31 March 2004.

Read more: UK: Surrey County Council's eGovernment services ahead of schedule

Further doubts have been cast over local government's ability to meet the 2005 e-government deadline for putting public services online, following the release of a new survey by Capita Software Services.

The survey of 97 local government officers and members, which was conducted at the IRRV Annual conference in October, revealed that only 68% of respondents believe that their authority is on track to meet e-government targets.

Read more: UK: Local government is definitely not on track

A big study of 100 major worldwide city websites ranked Seoul, Hong Kong, Singapore, New York, and Shanghai as the top five cities, with London trailing in 55th place, and Dublin 17th.

London scored poorly on its web site www.london.gov.uk because it does not excel in any area, has distinctly poor usability, and just doesn't stack up to better designed sites. Looks like Ken should get his site re-designed having had a serious chin-wag with Jakob Nielsen or Jared Spool, those gurus of usability.

Read more: UK: London's web site compares dismally vs other global cities says report

Go to top