Researchers writing in the BMJ said although telehealth reduced demands on NHS services, equipment costs outweighed savings and was not an effective use of NHS funds at current prices.
At 2009 equipment costs, the cost per quality-adjusted life year (QALY) was £92,000 - three times the level considered by NICE to be cost-effective.
Read more: GB: Telehealth 'not good use of NHS money', finds DH-backed study
The official evaluation of the Department of Health funded Whole Systems Demonstrator pilot showed the approach had just an 11% likelihood of proving cost-effective for the NHS at this threshold, when added to standard care.
Read more: GB: Flagship telehealth scheme 'cost £92,000 per QALY'
The move by managers in North Yorkshire comes after the bulk of family doctors in the county showed little interest in a programme hailed as a trailblazer for the NHS to monitor patients’ vital signs from home.
Read more: GB: North Yorkshire: Cash-crisis NHS chiefs write off telehealth devices
The findings follow a BMJ study published last month showing that telehealth does not improve quality of life for patients with long term conditions.
Telehealth uses technology to help people with health problems live more independently at home. For example, blood pressure or blood glucose levels can be measured at home and electronically transmitted to a health professional, reducing the need for hospital visits.
Read more: GB: Telehealth unlikely to be cost effective for patients with long term conditions
