Heute 381

Gestern 763

Insgesamt 39679506

Sonntag, 27.10.2024
Transforming Government since 2001
The federal government has never been better positioned on its enterprise architecture, but agencies still lack the ability to keep up that performance over the long term, officials said this week. "Just looking back five years or more, and looking at where we are today…we are, believe me, much further ahead of where we were previously," said David McClure, vice president for e-government at the Council for Excellence in Government. "There's agreement on frameworks, there's a lot of management tools, we have a common assessment process and we're seeing progress."

McClure and others spoke May 19 at a hearing of the House Government Reform Committee's Technology, Information Policy, Intergovernmental Relations and the Census Subcommittee.

The progress, however, is not yet where agencies need to be in order to sustain any level of performance on enterprise architecture. In fact, on the General Accounting Office's framework to evaluate the maturity of agencies' EA processes, 76 of the 96 agencies are still ranked at the first, most basic stage, said Randy Hite, director of information technology architecture and systems.

That ranking does not mean that agencies are all at the bottom of the list, said Kim Nelson, chief information officer at the Environmental Protection Agency. Many meet requirements at higher stages, and keeping that in mind is important to understand where agencies stand, said Daniel Matthews, chief information officer at the Transportation Department.

The GAO framework uses the same standards to show improvement as the Office of Management and Budget does for the President's Management Agenda Scorecard, requiring that all conditions at one level be satisfied – no matter how seemingly insignificant – before raising a score, Hite said.

OMB has its own assessment, which officials developed to complement GAO's maturity evaluation, and putting the two together provides a more complete picture of the good and the bad, said Karen Evans, administrator for e-government and IT at OMB.

"You can use the two frameworks together to really get a handle on how the agency is moving forward, how mature that process really is," she said.

Some things holding up agencies are critical, particularly the lack of skilled architects in lead and support positions, said Norman Lorentz, senior vice president at DigitalNet Government Solutions and former chief technology officer at OMB, where he led the initial development of the federal enterprise architecture. Filling the vacant chief architecture position at OMB with a person who has the technical and business know-how to talk to both sides of every organization should lead to finding similar people within the agencies, he said.

RELATED LINKS

Quelle: Federal Computer Week, 20.05.2004

Zum Seitenanfang